On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 07:27, Ming Cheng via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote: Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID.
There is no such thing. Can do by boost?
Therefore no. As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you
experience people just help.
------------------------------ *From:* Boost-users <boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org> on behalf of Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM *To:* boost-users@lists.boost.org <boost-users@lists.boost.org> *Cc:* Gavin Lambert <boost@mirality.co.nz> *Subject:* Re: [Boost-users] UUID
On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote:
so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs?
Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid. That road leads to pain and torment.
Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they can be persuaded to do things better. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
-- Richard Hodges hodges.r@gmail.com office: +44 2032 898 513 home: +376 861 195 mobile: +376 380 212