On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 07:27, Ming Cheng via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:

Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID.

There is no such thing.

Can do by boost?

Therefore no.

As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you experience people just help.

From: Boost-users <boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org> on behalf of Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM
To: boost-users@lists.boost.org <boost-users@lists.boost.org>
Cc: Gavin Lambert <boost@mirality.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] UUID

On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote:
> so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs?

Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid. That
road leads to pain and torment.

Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they
can be persuaded to do things better.
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users