Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke@gmail.com> writes:

Am Mo., 29. Nov. 2021 um 15:54 Uhr schrieb Boris Kolpackov < boris@codesynthesis.com>:

...

FWIW (and I may be out of context), but "spawn" seems like a too generic of a name. I, for example, thought this is about posix_spawn(). Maybe call it spawn_fiber or some such?

boost.asio named the function spawn() - boost.spawn named it spawn_fiber()

Sorry, looks I wasn't clear enough: I am talking about the library name being too generic: Boost.Spawn can mean spawning all kinds of things (processes, threads, fibers, etc). The fact that you called the function spawn_fiber() in a sense confirms this.