What is the status Property Tree Library?
I recall this library was accepted into boost: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/142785> but it seems it never made it into CVS? <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/148783> With 1.34 out the door and 1.35 to follow soon ;) it would be nice to have a current status of libraries that are supposed to make it into 1.35. It's possible I have missed this but I thought I'd post just in case. Thanks, Jamie
Jamie Allsop wrote:
but it seems it never made it into CVS? <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/148783> [...]
It's possible I have missed this but I thought I'd post just in case.
Ok, I just updated CVS and there it was... so scratch this post. Apologies for the noise, Jamie
Property tree is now in the CVS, but so far without docs, which are out of date because some changes were made to the library since the review time. cheers, Marcin
I recall this library was accepted into boost: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/142785>
but it seems it never made it into CVS? <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/148783>
With 1.34 out the door and 1.35 to follow soon ;) it would be nice to have a current status of libraries that are supposed to make it into 1.35.
It's possible I have missed this but I thought I'd post just in case.
Thanks, Jamie
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Property tree is now in the CVS, but so far without docs, which are out of date because some changes were made to the library since the review time.
Marcin, thanks for a great simple library. Really useful! Do you have plans to update in time for 1.35 inclusion given the stated aim of getting 1.35 to follow swiftly behind 1.34? Oh and has anyone had problem with its use on linux under Intel's 9.1 compiler? Is there a status page for recording the running of tests against latest HEAD libraries to see if it's just me? Early 9.1.0xx versions would let you instantiate one tree but squawk about more than one, but latest version won't even compile a single tree example. Example fine of gcc and on window's so we expected it to be a compiler 'feature'. Vague report to the point of being a bit useless, unfortunately I no longer have access to the test environment causing this. I'll try to dig out some error messages when I next get access to the compiler. Paul Baxter
Hi Paul,
Do you have plans to update in time for 1.35 inclusion given the stated aim of getting 1.35 to follow swiftly behind 1.34?
Yes I do. I hope to see ptree in 1.35.
Oh and has anyone had problem with its use on linux under Intel's 9.1 compiler? Is there a status page for recording the running of tests against latest HEAD libraries to see if it's just me?
The review version has been tested against Intel 9.0/Linux and worked fine. I don't know about 9.1, and also post-review changes might have introduced some incompatibilities. I hope to fix these before 1.35. Thanks, Marcin
Hi Marcin, Will property_tree include support for getting/setting environment variables in 1.35? http://kaalus.atspace.com/ptree/doc/index.html#environment_parser Thanks Shams -- "Jamie Allsop" <ja11sop@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:f2i5df$6pd$1@sea.gmane.org...
I recall this library was accepted into boost: <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/142785>
but it seems it never made it into CVS? <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/148783>
With 1.34 out the door and 1.35 to follow soon ;) it would be nice to have a current status of libraries that are supposed to make it into 1.35.
It's possible I have missed this but I thought I'd post just in case.
Thanks, Jamie
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (4)
-
Jamie Allsop -
Marcin Kalicinski -
Paul Baxter -
Shams