Re: [boost] quadmath as distinct library?

13 Mar
2023
13 Mar
'23
7:40 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:48 AM Gero Peterhoff via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Would it also make sense to "pull out" quaternion and octonion as distinct libraries?
There's already a [Boost.QVM][1] library for Quaternions. Are you aware of it? [1]: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_81_0/libs/qvm/doc/html/index.html
788
Age (days ago)
788
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Dominique Devienne