The root of svn tree has file called README.txt that say something about features in 1.34 release. It does not give very good impression -- can this file be either removed or updated? - Volodya
2009/4/14 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>:
The root of svn tree has file called README.txt that say something about features in 1.34 release. It does not give very good impression -- can this file be either removed or updated?
The release scripts automatically add the final README.txt based on the website's release notes, so it doesn't really matter what it says in subversion and it should be fine to change it to make clear that it's just a placeholder. Daniel
Daniel James wrote:
2009/4/14 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>:
The root of svn tree has file called README.txt that say something about features in 1.34 release. It does not give very good impression -- can this file be either removed or updated?
The release scripts automatically add the final README.txt based on the website's release notes, so it doesn't really matter what it says in subversion and it should be fine to change it to make clear that it's just a placeholder.
Why can't this file be removed in SVN, then? - Volodya
2009/4/14 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>:
Daniel James wrote:
2009/4/14 Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>:
The root of svn tree has file called README.txt that say something about features in 1.34 release. It does not give very good impression -- can this file be either removed or updated?
The release scripts automatically add the final README.txt based on the website's release notes, so it doesn't really matter what it says in subversion and it should be fine to change it to make clear that it's just a placeholder.
Why can't this file be removed in SVN, then?
It's used for cmake. I don't know if it's still required. But it's nice to have a placeholder in case anyone links to it. Daniel
It's used for cmake. I don't know if it's still required. But it's nice to have a placeholder in case anyone links to it.
If it's needed, I think that the contents should be replaced with something like "The contents of this file are automatically generated" instead of outdated data. My 0.02$ Philippe
participants (4)
-
Daniel James -
Philippe Vaucher -
troy d. straszheim -
Vladimir Prus