[graph] kick out or replace transitive_reduction()?

8 Oct
2012
8 Oct
'12
11:53 a.m.
Hi, shall the transitive_reduction function (transitive_reduction.hpp) of boost_graph ever be used? I ask because * I can find no docs about it * It is unhandy to use, since the nodes are permuted (in opposite to transitive_closure(), which offers a version with *constant* permutation) * I've found bugs in the header, which were stated to be bugs by the original author (asked him via email) If this function should not be used, I'd write a very simple one, using the formula from [1]. Note that this will only work for DAGs, but that's better than nothing. What do you think? Regards, Johannes [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitive_reduction#Graph_algorithms_for_trans...
4631
Age (days ago)
4631
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Johannes Lorenz