I would also like to request anyone who looks at this or spends time with it share on the list what they have learned. So far, it looks like it is gcc only as shipped, so porting is one area that needs analysis

-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Brian Braatz Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:22 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: RE: [boost] Re: google going open source

Just quickly- I am making good progress on app integration and adding to the Profiler library by Chris Diggins.

I will be mailing out more info in the next few weeks.

Additionally- a quick look at below looks like it would be something that would add value to profiler lib. I plan on taking a deeper look at that and will report back what I see. I want to REALLY spend some time with below to understand it better\ see how it could fit in with current profiler being worked on.

THANK YOU for sending this out, very interesting....

...

-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Martin Wille Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 12:50 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Re: google going open source

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

...

"Bronek Kozicki" <brok@rubikon.pl> wrote in message news:4239ED44.5090508@rubikon.pl... | under BSD 2.0 license | http://code.google.com/ |

Hm...would anyone volenteer to boostify https://sourceforge.net/projects/goog-perftools/,

Can't be done, due to the license.