reverse_iterator and reverse_const_iterator actually refer the same type:

typedef char_type const* iterator; typedef char_type const* const_iterator; typedef std::reverse_iterator<iterator> reverse_iterator; typedef std::reverse_iterator<const_iterator> reverse_const_iterator;

Agree, but which name should we used - "reverse_const_iterator" or "const_reverse_iterator"? I thought it was the latter. Igor Kholodov cttl@users.sourceforge.net http://cttl.sourceforge.net/