Which libraries on the review schedule are ready for review?

Hi, I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review. Lexer Ben Hanson - Eric Niebler - Shifted Pointer Phil Bouchard - Needed - Logging John Torjo - Gennadiy Rozental - Join Yigong Liu - Needed - Pimpl Vladimir Batov - Needed - Task Oliver Kowalke - Vicente Botet - Endian Beman Dawes - Needed - Conversion Vicente Botet - Needed - Sorting Steven Ross - Needed - AutoBuffer Thorsten Ottosen - Robert Stewart - String Convert Vladimir Batov - Needed - Containers Ion Gaztañaga - Needed - Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron - Joel Falcou - Interthreads Vicente Botet - Needed - Bitfield Vicente Botet - Needed - Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed - Fiber Oliver Kowalke - Needed - Creasing (Sequence Properties) Grant Erickson - Needed - Static Size Linear Algebra Emil Dotchevski - Needed - Locale Artyom Beilis - Needed - XInt Chad Nelson - Needed - Context Oliver Kowalke - Needed - Stopwatches Vicente Botet - Anthony Williams - Please could you replay to this mail for each one of your libraries? Thanks, Vicente

From: vicente.botet <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
[snip] Locale Artyom Beilis - Needed -
Boost.Locale - ready for review. Downloads: https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcms/files/boost_locale/ Reference: http://cppcms.sourceforge.net/boost_locale/html/index.html Tutorial: http://cppcms.sourceforge.net/boost_locale/html/tutorial.html Artyom P.S.: Please update the link to the download. P.P.S.: Review Manager needed.

On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:13:53 +0100 "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
[...] XInt Chad Nelson - Needed - [...]
Ready, and now has a review manager (Vladimir Prus). We're discussing dates for the review now. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *

El 16/01/2011 13:17, John Maddock escribió:
Containers Ion Gaztañaga - Needed -
Ready and trying to find a review manager. Volunteers welcome ;-)
I'm willing to volunteer if that helps, John.
Thanks John, it would be nice to have a review manager with your boost experience. Best, Ion

----- Original Message ----- From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 2:13 PM Subject: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready for review?
Hi,
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
Conversion Vicente Botet - Needed -
Ready and looking for a review manager. Vicente

----- Original Message ----- From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 2:13 PM Subject: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready for review?
Hi,
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
Stopwatches Vicente Botet - Anthony Williams -
Ready. I hope we could do the review before Boost.Con and I would prefer to release Boost.Ratio and Boost.Chrono before. Vicente

Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed -
ready, although: - i won't have time during the next 3 months - since it depends on boost.atomic, i would prefer to have that library reviewed before tim -- tim@klingt.org http://tim.klingt.org Form is a result - the result of a process. Edgard Varèse

On 1/17/2011 7:39 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed -
ready, although: - i won't have time during the next 3 months - since it depends on boost.atomic, i would prefer to have that library reviewed before
Can you add a reference sectiopn to your docs for the 3 classes in your library ?

Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed -
ready, although: - i won't have time during the next 3 months - since it depends on boost.atomic, i would prefer to have that library reviewed before
Can you add a reference sectiopn to your docs for the 3 classes in your library ?
you mean `reference' as in `class reference' [1]? cheers, tim [1] http://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree/lockfree/reference.html -- tim@klingt.org http://tim.klingt.org It is better to make a piece of music than to perform one, better to perform one than to listen to one, better to listen to one than to misuse it as a means of distraction, entertainment, or acquisition of 'culture'. John Cage

On 1/17/2011 12:12 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed -
ready, although: - i won't have time during the next 3 months - since it depends on boost.atomic, i would prefer to have that library reviewed before
Can you add a reference sectiopn to your docs for the 3 classes in your library ?
you mean `reference' as in `class reference' [1]?
cheers, tim
[1] http://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree/lockfree/reference.html
Yes, that's what I mean. It should be part of the distribution in the vault else nobody can find it. I do see some help in the distribution but it does not have what your link above has.

Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed -
ready, although: - i won't have time during the next 3 months - since it depends on boost.atomic, i would prefer to have that library reviewed before
Can you add a reference sectiopn to your docs for the 3 classes in your library ?
you mean `reference' as in `class reference' [1]?
cheers, tim
[1] http://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree/lockfree/reference.html
Yes, that's what I mean. It should be part of the distribution in the vault else nobody can find it. I do see some help in the distribution but it does not have what your link above has.
the vault package is just updated every once in a while. my git repository contains the latest version. tim [1] git://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree.git -- tim@klingt.org http://tim.klingt.org Silence is only frightening to people who are compulsively verbalizing. William S. Burroughs

On 1/18/2011 5:00 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Lockfree Tim Blechmann - Needed -
ready, although: - i won't have time during the next 3 months - since it depends on boost.atomic, i would prefer to have that library reviewed before
Can you add a reference sectiopn to your docs for the 3 classes in your library ?
you mean `reference' as in `class reference' [1]?
cheers, tim
[1] http://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree/lockfree/reference.html
Yes, that's what I mean. It should be part of the distribution in the vault else nobody can find it. I do see some help in the distribution but it does not have what your link above has.
the vault package is just updated every once in a while. my git repository contains the latest version.
tim
[1] git://tim.klingt.org/boost_lockfree.git
Then you should request a change to the Boost Review Schedule page at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html so that Lockfree points to your Git repository or you should update your vault package to reflect your latest changes.

----- Original Message ----- From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 2:13 PM Subject: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready for review?
Hi,
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
Bitfield Vicente Botet - Needed -
Bitfields will be included in the BitMask Brian Barman's library (SOC project). Bitfields could be reviewed before if find a review manager, but I realy think the Brian's interface is much more friendly. So this item in the list could change in a near future. We could remove it temporarilly and add the Brian's library once he will be ready. Vicente

From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr>
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
Pimpl Vladimir Batov - Needed - String Convert Vladimir Batov - Needed - Yes, both are ready for review. V.

Hi, The following libraries have a bad link in http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html. Please, could the authors provide a link for them? * Endian Beman Dawes * Lexer Ben Hanson The link of the following libraries doesn't points directly to a file to download. Could the authors provide a link that don't change after each upload? * Task Oliver Kowalke * Lockfree Tim Blechmann * Fiber Oliver Kowalke * Context Oliver Kowalke * Locale Artyom Beilis This library doesn't contains a link to a package to review. Could the author provide one? Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron The link of the following libraries doesn't contains the html documentation. Could the authors provide a direct link to the documentation or include the documentation on the linked package. * Creasing (Sequence Properties) Grant Erickson * Locale Artyom Beilis * XInt Chad Nelson * Process Boris Schaeling Thanks, Vicente

[snip] The link of the following libraries doesn't points directly to a file to download. Could the authors provide a link that don't change after each upload?
* Locale Artyom Beilis
Actually I've already asked not-once to update it. Please provide following two links: Downloads: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcms/files/boost_locale/ Documentation: http://cppcms.sourceforge.net/boost_locale/html/index.html Thanks, Artyom

This library doesn't contains a link to a package to review. Could the author provide one?
Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron
Well, I am using the sand_box but the link does not work anymore as it has been turned off. Should I put a tarball in the vault? I have tried my svn connexion options but it does not work. Could I get a username and password? Frédéric

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.bron@m4x.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 6:44 AM Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready forreview?
This library doesn't contains a link to a package to review. Could the author provide one?
Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron
Well, I am using the sand_box but the link does not work anymore as it has been turned off.
http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/type_traits/ and http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/type_traits/libs/type_traits/doc/html... works for me. As pointer for the on-going library. But you will need to provide also a compressed file for the users that don't have SNV. BTW, the documentation is included on the complete TypeTraits documentation. In order to make easier the review it would be great if you made a documentation including only the extensions, with motivation, tutorial examples and the reference sections. Maybe you could include all the files in libs/type_traits in another directory as libs/type_traits_operators.
Should I put a tarball in the vault? I have tried my svn connexion options but it does not work. Could I get a username and password?
Just try to loging the first time and register yourself. HTH, Vicente

http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/type_traits/ and http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/type_traits/libs/type_traits/doc/html... works for me.
Yes you are right, these work just fine. I had another one that do not work anymore: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox/type_traits I am happy you gave me another way to get access to it.
But you will need to provide also a compressed file for the users that don't have SVN.
Should I put a tarball in the vault? I have tried my svn connexion options but it does not work. Could I get a username and password?
Just try to loging the first time and register yourself.
OK, this seems to work fine also. Thanks.
BTW, the documentation is included on the complete TypeTraits documentation. In order to make easier the review it would be great if you made a documentation including only the extensions, with motivation, tutorial examples and the reference sections. Maybe you could include all the files in libs/type_traits in another directory as libs/type_traits_operators.
I am progressing quite well these days with taking care of pointer cases so I am going to continue as before and when it is all finished, I will find a way to address that point. I would not like to write documentation that would not be part of the library. Regards, Frédéric

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.bron@m4x.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are readyforreview?
BTW, the documentation is included on the complete TypeTraits documentation. In order to make easier the review it would be great if you made a documentation including only the extensions, with motivation, tutorial examples and the reference sections. Maybe you could include all the files in libs/type_traits in another directory as libs/type_traits_operators.
I will find a way to address that point. I would not like to write documentation that would not be part of the library.
I understand your concern. But you should facilitate the reading of the doc for the review and make clear what is under review. Best, Vicente

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:33:43 +0100 "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
The link of the following libraries doesn't contains the html documentation. Could the authors provide a direct link to the documentation or include the documentation on the linked package.
* XInt Chad Nelson
The documentation is in the linked package, but I've also uploaded it to my server, until the review is over. Please note on that page that it's here: <http://www.oakcircle.com/xint_docs/>. Also, please update the entry for it, to note that Vladimir Prus has volunteered as the review manager. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *

Chad Nelson-2 wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:33:43 +0100 "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
The link of the following libraries doesn't contains the html documentation. Could the authors provide a direct link to the documentation or include the documentation on the linked package.
* XInt Chad Nelson
The documentation is in the linked package, but I've also uploaded it to my server, until the review is over. Please note on that page that it's here: <http://www.oakcircle.com/xint_docs/>.
Sorry. It was an error from my side.
Also, please update the entry for it, to note that Vladimir Prus has volunteered as the review manager.
I'm not part of the review wizards. You should contact them directly to signal them that there is a review manager candidate for your lib. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Which-libraries-on-the-review-schedule-ar... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

This library doesn't contains a link to a package to review. Could the author provide one? Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron
I have added a link to the vault: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_traits.tar.bz2&directory=Extension& Could somebody update the review schedule page? http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html Frédéric

----- Original Message ----- From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.bron@m4x.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready forreview?
This library doesn't contains a link to a package to review. Could the author provide one? Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron
I have added a link to the vault: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_traits.tar.bz2&directory=Extension& Could somebody update the review schedule page? http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html Frédéric _______________________________________________ Done. Note that this is not the official page. I maintain this page trying to include informations that otherwise could be lost. If you have write access to the wiki you can make modifications yourself. Best, Vicente

Thank you for the link. I will update the review schedule page. Ron On Jan 23, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
This library doesn't contains a link to a package to review. Could the author provide one? Type Traits Extensions Frédéric Bron
I have added a link to the vault: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_traits.tar.bz2&directory=Extension&
Could somebody update the review schedule page? http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html
Frédéric _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

The link of the following libraries doesn't points directly to a file to download. Could the authors provide a link that don't change after each upload?
* Lockfree Tim Blechmann
http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz -- tim@klingt.org http://tim.klingt.org Lesser artists borrow, great artists steal. Igor Stravinsky

----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Blechmann" <tim@klingt.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready forreview?
The link of the following libraries doesn't points directly to a file to download. Could the authors provide a link that don't change after each upload?
* Lockfree Tim Blechmann
http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz
Could you provide a link to the documentation? Best, Vicente

----- Original Message ----- From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are readyforreview?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Blechmann" <tim@klingt.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Which libraries on the review schedule are ready forreview?
The link of the following libraries doesn't points directly to a file to download. Could the authors provide a link that don't change after each upload?
* Lockfree Tim Blechmann
http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz
Could you provide a link to the documentation?
Sorry I meant, could you include the documentation on the compressed file? Vicente

Hi Vicente, Wizards,
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
I'm glad about the fixed links and review manager volunteers that came out of this survey. Here is a list of libraries where the author didn't respond to your query, and I expect they need a ping to see if they're still interested and ready. I'd be willing to contact them if they don't respond to this... Second Call: Are your libraries ready for review? Shifted Pointer Phil Bouchard Join Yigong Liu Endian Beman Dawes Sorting Steven Ross Creasing (Sequence Properties) Grant Erickson I know I haven't seen a few of these people for a long time & I think one or two might have been discouraged by the informal debate. There are another seven where the author replied to this thread or some other recent query, who *definitely* need review managers: Pimpl Vladimir Batov Conversion Vicente Botet String Convert Vladimir Batov Lockfree Tim Blechmann (depends on Atomic) Fiber Oliver Kowalke (depends on Context) Quaternions, Vectors, Matrices (QVM) Emil Dotchevski Variadic Macro Data Edward Diener Aspiring authors, please take up the mantle of review manager! Thanks, Gordon

On Feb 21, 2011, at 4:22 AM, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
Here is a list of libraries where the author didn't respond to your query, and I expect they need a ping to see if they're still interested and ready. I'd be willing to contact them if they don't respond to this...
Second Call: Are your libraries ready for review?
To be clear, a list of libraries *needing review managers* where we haven't heard from the author recently... ATM I'm not concerned with libraries that have a review manager but aren't ready.
Shifted Pointer Phil Bouchard
This one brings me back! http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2008/08/140852.php
Join Yigong Liu
Endian Beman Dawes
Sorting Steven Ross
Creasing (Sequence Properties) Grant Erickson

Hello Gordon, FYI, I have already contacted all of the library authors on the list below, have received updated information from most of them, and am still awaiting replies from a few. The case of concern right now is Phil Bouchard, whose emails are bouncing. Best, Ron On Feb 21, 2011, at 4:22 AM, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
Hi Vicente, Wizards,
I would like the authors of the libraries on the review schedule state clearly if his libraries are ready for review.
I'm glad about the fixed links and review manager volunteers that came out of this survey.
Here is a list of libraries where the author didn't respond to your query, and I expect they need a ping to see if they're still interested and ready. I'd be willing to contact them if they don't respond to this...
Second Call: Are your libraries ready for review?
Shifted Pointer Phil Bouchard
Join Yigong Liu
Endian Beman Dawes
Sorting Steven Ross
Creasing (Sequence Properties) Grant Erickson
I know I haven't seen a few of these people for a long time & I think one or two might have been discouraged by the informal debate.
There are another seven where the author replied to this thread or some other recent query, who *definitely* need review managers:
Pimpl Vladimir Batov
Conversion Vicente Botet
String Convert Vladimir Batov
Lockfree Tim Blechmann (depends on Atomic)
Fiber Oliver Kowalke (depends on Context)
Quaternions, Vectors, Matrices (QVM) Emil Dotchevski
Variadic Macro Data Edward Diener
Aspiring authors, please take up the mantle of review manager!
Thanks, Gordon
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Hi Ron,
Here is a list of libraries where the author didn't respond to your query, and I expect they need a ping to see if they're still interested and ready. I'd be willing to contact them if they don't respond to this...
FYI, I have already contacted all of the library authors on the list below, have received updated information from most of them, and am still awaiting replies from a few. The case of concern right now is Phil Bouchard, whose emails are bouncing.
Great! Could those who don't get back to you eventually be moved to another "proposed but never reviewed" list, or just removed, so that potential review managers know where to start? Thanks, Gordon

Hi Gordon, Actually, that's already being done :). In the last few weeks several libraries have been removed from the review schedule after consulting with the authors. Best, Ron On Feb 21, 2011, at 1:24 PM, Gordon Woodhull wrote:
Hi Ron,
Here is a list of libraries where the author didn't respond to your query, and I expect they need a ping to see if they're still interested and ready. I'd be willing to contact them if they don't respond to this...
FYI, I have already contacted all of the library authors on the list below, have received updated information from most of them, and am still awaiting replies from a few. The case of concern right now is Phil Bouchard, whose emails are bouncing.
Great! Could those who don't get back to you eventually be moved to another "proposed but never reviewed" list, or just removed, so that potential review managers know where to start?
Thanks, Gordon _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (13)
-
Artyom
-
Chad Nelson
-
Edward Diener
-
Frédéric Bron
-
Gordon Woodhull
-
Ion Gaztañaga
-
Joel Falcou
-
John Maddock
-
Ronald Garcia
-
Tim Blechmann
-
Vicente Botet
-
vicente.botet
-
Vladimir Batov