Re: [boost] [EXTERNAL] Boost 1.63.0 Release Candidate 1

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Marshall Clow
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Rene Rivera
wrote: >> >> As I mentioned to Marshall, the results here: > http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/ config.html > are > horribly outdated - are they actually being run and updated? > > It appears that all 'develop' tests are at least one week late if not much more.
I was not aware of the stalled results.. Investigating now.
I think Sandia testers on Darwin and Linux are cycling okay in both develop and master, there’s results up there from Dec 20th. Are the Sandia config test results wrong or unexpected?
The latest results from Sandia that I can see are from 12th. The report info[1] also says it was run last time on 12th.
[1]: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/ index.html
The report generation issue is now addressed. The results are current and show tests from today.
I see lots of new results for "master", but none for "develop". (yet)
Interesting. This page: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/config.html shows new results, but this one http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/summary.html does not. -- Marshall

On Dec 20, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Marshall Clow
wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Marshall Clow
wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Rene Rivera
wrote: >>> >>> As I mentioned to Marshall, the results here: >> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/ config.html >> are >> horribly outdated - are they actually being run and updated? >> >> > It appears that all 'develop' tests are at least one week late if not > much > more. >
I was not aware of the stalled results.. Investigating now.
I think Sandia testers on Darwin and Linux are cycling okay in both develop and master, there’s results up there from Dec 20th. Are the Sandia config test results wrong or unexpected?
The latest results from Sandia that I can see are from 12th. The report info[1] also says it was run last time on 12th.
[1]: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/ index.html
The report generation issue is now addressed. The results are current and show tests from today.
I see lots of new results for "master", but none for "develop". (yet)
Interesting. This page: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/config.html shows new results, but this one http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/summary.html does not.
Strange, the develop summary.html shows new results for me. Perhaps your browser has cached the page? All Sandia testers on this page show Dec 20th results (except for a couple of Intel testers). — Noel

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth
On Dec 20, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Marshall Clow
wrote: I see lots of new results for "master", but none for "develop". (yet)
Interesting. This page: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/config.html shows new results, but this one http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/summary.html does not.
Strange, the develop summary.html shows new results for me. Perhaps your browser has cached the page? All Sandia testers on this page show Dec 20th results (except for a couple of Intel testers).
*Now* I see updated results. Before I did not (and yes, I refreshed the page and tried two different browsers). Odd, but it seems to have passed. -- Marshall

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Marshall Clow
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Belcourt, Kenneth
wrote: On Dec 20, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Marshall Clow
wrote: I see lots of new results for "master", but none for "develop". (yet)
Interesting. This page: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/config.html shows new results, but this one http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/summary.html does not.
Strange, the develop summary.html shows new results for me. Perhaps your browser has cached the page? All Sandia testers on this page show Dec
20th
results (except for a couple of Intel testers).
*Now* I see updated results. Before I did not (and yes, I refreshed the page and tried two different browsers).
Odd, but it seems to have passed.
I had to individually refresh the subframes to get the new content to show up in Chrome (which has aggressive caching). -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
participants (3)
-
Belcourt, Kenneth
-
Marshall Clow
-
Rene Rivera