To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited. John Phillips Review Manager
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Phillips Sent: 06 August 2007 13:46 To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] Looking for Time Series reviews
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
I'm strongly in favour of this library - from my previous rather cursory experiments with it. I am trying to find time for another decent look at it - but plead beign very busy trying to get the Math Toolkit docs refined ready for the next release ;-) Meanwhile I vote a "Yes definitely - a must have". Paul --- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow@hetp.u-net.com
John Phillips wrote:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
John Phillips Review Manager
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
I would love to review this one, but it falls right in the middle of the busiest time of the year for the experiments I work on. I'm certain I won't have the time to devote to a review before early September, unfortunately. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Lynch voice: (617) 353-6025 Physics Department Fax: (617) 353-9393 Boston University office: PRB-361 590 Commonwealth Ave. e-mail: krlynch@bu.edu Boston, MA 02215 USA http://budoe.bu.edu/~krlynch -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
I would love to review this one, but it falls right in the middle of the busiest time of the year for the experiments I work on. I'm certain I won't have the time to devote to a review before early September, unfortunately.
I also would love to write a review, but am in more-or-less the same boat, as I would want to have had the time to use the library in some real application first. Matthias
For the record, I am working on a review of the Time Series Library in between other things. I hope to have it complete before the current review deadline. ron On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:46 AM, John Phillips wrote:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
John Phillips Review Manager
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/ listinfo.cgi/boost
Ronald Garcia wrote:
For the record, I am working on a review of the Time Series Library in between other things. I hope to have it complete before the current review deadline.
ron
Ron, (and any others in the same boat) I don't see a review from you, yet, but I'm in the condensing and deciding phase of the review, so you could still send me something if you have anything. Thanks. John
AMDG John Phillips <phillips <at> delos.mps.ohio-state.edu> writes:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one?
Working on a review right now... In Christ, Steven Watanabe
On 8/6/07, John Phillips <phillips@delos.mps.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
I really want to participate but I gave my last exam last week and now I am heading to an Open Source congress for a week. I think I will not have time for a formal review there :( I have already give Eric feedback a month ago, and I think the library is a nice inclusion for piece wise manipulation series like the ones found in banking account management. I am not convinced that is the best approach for a general discrete signals framework where to build up digital systems libraries, like FIR and IIR filters, filter networks or non linear and adaptive filters. But just as with Boost.Regex, Boost.Spirit and Boost.Xpressive, I think that boost will benefit from having Eric lib and (once it is ready) a more DSP friendly framework specially designed real time or block processing. I will try to check my mail as often as possible during the congress so I can jump in in discussions and participate. Too bad the congress is this week :( King regards Matias
Matias Capeletto wrote:
On 8/6/07, John Phillips <phillips@delos.mps.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
I really want to participate but I gave my last exam last week and now I am heading to an Open Source congress for a week. I think I will not have time for a formal review there :(
I have already give Eric feedback a month ago, and I think the library is a nice inclusion for piece wise manipulation series like the ones found in banking account management.
I am not convinced that is the best approach for a general discrete signals framework where to build up digital systems libraries, like FIR and IIR filters, filter networks or non linear and adaptive filters.
<snip> Matias, if you summarize your DSP design ideas for the list, then I can tell everyone what I told you ... that a similar design was tried for Time_series and found not to work in practice. I asked you to try writing generic algorithms using the concepts you designed. Have you? -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
On 8/7/07, Eric Niebler <eric@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
Matias Capeletto wrote:
On 8/6/07, John Phillips <phillips@delos.mps.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
I really want to participate but I gave my last exam last week and now I am heading to an Open Source congress for a week. I think I will not have time for a formal review there :(
I have already give Eric feedback a month ago, and I think the library is a nice inclusion for piece wise manipulation series like the ones found in banking account management.
I am not convinced that is the best approach for a general discrete signals framework where to build up digital systems libraries, like FIR and IIR filters, filter networks or non linear and adaptive filters.
<snip>
Matias, if you summarize your DSP design ideas for the list, then I can tell everyone what I told you ... that a similar design was tried for Time_series and found not to work in practice.
I think that for DSP the best way to model a signal is a dense sequence, that is not based in the RangeRun concepts. I think how to implement convolution or FIR block processing based on DFT and I do not find an easy way, but I have not spend enough time on it.
I asked you to try writing generic algorithms using the concepts you designed. Have you?
No, I have not find the time yet. That is why I just said I am not convinced, no more than that. And I state again that a RangeRun based library is a good addition to Boost and can cohabit in Boost with others DSP libraries. Best regards Matias PS: Sorry for the lenght of the messages, I am in the middle of the congress :)
participants (8)
-
Eric Niebler -
John Phillips -
Kevin Lynch -
Matias Capeletto -
Matthias Schabel -
Paul A Bristow -
Ronald Garcia -
Steven Watanabe