[hash] hash_float_test failure
Hello! The functional/hash/has_float_test test fails in CalebEpstein-V2 test results. I suspect that's some Sun-specific floating point accuracy issue. Caleb, can you check if that test works with V1? If so, can you get command lines for both V1 and V2 via: 1. Going to libs/functional/hast/test 2. Running "bjam -a -n -sTOOLS=gcc-3-4-3" and then "bjam -n -a --v2 gcc-3.4.3" and then send the command lines to me. If the test fails with V1, then maybe we need some Sun expert to tell the right command line option. Thanks, Volodya
On 3/13/06, Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> wrote:
The functional/hash/has_float_test test fails in CalebEpstein-V2 test results.
I suspect that's some Sun-specific floating point accuracy issue.
Caleb, can you check if that test works with V1? If so, can you get command
They don't and never have. There is markup in explicit-failures-markup.xmlfor this failure (and similar ones in math/octonion_test and quaternion_test), but the toolset name was BBv1-style. I'v corrected this in CVS. -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com
On Monday 13 March 2006 19:03, Caleb Epstein wrote:
On 3/13/06, Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> wrote:
The functional/hash/has_float_test test fails in CalebEpstein-V2 test results.
I suspect that's some Sun-specific floating point accuracy issue.
Caleb, can you check if that test works with V1? If so, can you get command
They don't and never have. There is markup in explicit-failures-markup.xmlfor this failure (and similar ones in math/octonion_test and quaternion_test), but the toolset name was BBv1-style. I'v corrected this in CVS.
Thank you! Just as a check -- did you add "-sun" to the gcc versions defined in your user-config.jam? I.e. using gcc : 3.4.3-sun : ....... ? Thanks, Volodya
On 3/13/06, Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su> wrote:
The functional/hash/has_float_test test fails in CalebEpstein-V2 test results.
I suspect that's some Sun-specific floating point accuracy issue.
Caleb, can you check if that test works with V1? If so, can you get command lines for both V1 and V2 via:
The test has been failing for some time. This failure suggests a problem with ldexp or frexp for long doubles. Looking at http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/04/83872.php it seems that the library has overloads for long doubles, but I expect the implementation treats them as doubles. But regardless, this is probably not a build issue. Daniel
participants (3)
-
Caleb Epstein -
Daniel James -
Vladimir Prus