Re: 1.32 release preparation
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:35:15 -0400, David Abrahams wrote
Should we have accepted libraries checked in immediately (on a branch, maybe?), Maybe we should reconsider the meaning of 'acceptance' in the review process. Apart of that, I think that this is a very good idea.
and then only added to the libs page when the authors deem them ready? We should list them on the lib page but in a special section.
If they're checked in on the trunk they can even get the benefit of regression testing while the authors whip them into shape. Yes, that would be fine.
With best regards Johannes
"Johannes Brunen" <jbrunen@datasolid.de> writes:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:35:15 -0400, David Abrahams wrote
Should we have accepted libraries checked in immediately (on a branch, maybe?), Maybe we should reconsider the meaning of 'acceptance' in the review process. Apart of that, I think that this is a very good idea.
and then only added to the libs page when the authors deem them ready? We should list them on the lib page but in a special section.
I don't like the sound of that. It should be very clear to people which things are part of Boost and which aren't. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
participants (2)
-
David Abrahams -
Johannes Brunen