Hello, We are using boost.logging library in our project. We prefered that library because of header-only structure and it looks great. But recently I have found some two bugs. First of them its crash while output in syslog. I found that template<class msg_type> void operator()(const msg_type & msg) const { syslog( LOG_INFO, msg.c_str() ); } looks incorrect, because second argument is format string, so next line lead boost.logging to crash: amazon.co.uk%2fgp%2f%26nbsp%3b%2fref%3dpe_15031_15751501_pe_47%2f%26nbsp%3b (I need output some html parts in syslog like debug info). So I replaced code above with: template<class msg_type> void operator()(const msg_type & msg) const { syslog( LOG_INFO, "%s", msg.c_str() ); } Which works correct, but it seems not general solution. What do you think? And the second one is compiling under gcc 3.4.6 issue: ../3rdparty/boost/boost_1_37_0/boost/logging/format/destination/syslog.hpp: In member function `void boost::logging::destination::syslog_no_levels_t<convert_dest>::operator()(const msg_type&) const [with msg_type = std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, convert_dest = boost::logging::destination::do_convert_destination]': ../3rdparty/boost/boost_1_37_0/boost/logging/detail/manipulator.hpp:571: instantiated from `void boost::logging::manipulator::detail::generic_holder<generic_type, manipulator_base>::operator()(typename manipulator_base::param) const [with generic_type = boost::logging::destination::syslog_no_levels_t<boost::logging::destination::do_convert_destination>, manipulator_base = boost::logging::destination::base<boost::logging::default_, boost::logging::default_>]' LMLog.cpp:219: instantiated from here ../3rdparty/boost/boost_1_37_0/boost/logging/format/destination/syslog.hpp:41: error: expected primary-expression That can be fixed by pointing template keyword before operator() calling: ../3rdparty/boost/boost_1_37_0/boost/logging/detail/manipulator.hpp:571 Use virtual void operator()(param val) const { m_val.template operator()(val); } Instead virtual void operator()(param val) const { m_val.operator()(val); } Thank you for such library, I'm waiting for your comments. Regards, Dmitriy Lyfar.