But Boost.JSON needs a Review Manager! Don't be shy now! Repository: https://github.com/cppalliance/json Documentation: http://vinniefalco.github.io/doc/json/index.html -- Regards, Vinnie Follow me on GitHub: https://github.com/vinniefalco
On 2020-08-22 17:57, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
But Boost.JSON needs a Review Manager! Don't be shy now!
Repository: https://github.com/cppalliance/json
Documentation: http://vinniefalco.github.io/doc/json/index.html
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite. Our discussion policy is here: https://www.boost.org/community/policy.html
Andrey - lighten up. Half the fun of boost is the drama filled communication which sometimes produces (intentionally or unintentionally) occasional flashes of humor. Robert Ramey On 8/22/20 9:47 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
On 2020-08-22 17:57, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
But Boost.JSON needs a Review Manager! Don't be shy now!
Repository: https://github.com/cppalliance/json
Documentation: http://vinniefalco.github.io/doc/json/index.html
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
Our discussion policy is here:
https://www.boost.org/community/policy.html
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
sob., 22 sie 2020, 18:48 użytkownik Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> napisał:
On 2020-08-22 17:57, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
But Boost.JSON needs a Review Manager! Don't be shy now!
Repository: https://github.com/cppalliance/json
Documentation: http://vinniefalco.github.io/doc/json/index.html
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
I was about to make similar remark. Those are spam-like subjects that make me personally want to send the message to trash w/o reading it. On practical side, it's not archive friendly too. Instead, I'd prefer to receive: "JSON library is looking for review manager" Mateusz Loskot, mateusz@loskot.net (Sent from mobile, may suffer from top-posting)
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now? Thanks
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?
If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;) One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
How about this :) Mateusz Loskot via Boost said: (by the date of Sat, 22 Aug 2020 20:46:16 +0200)
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?
If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)
One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules.
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- # Janek Kozicki http://janek.kozicki.pl/
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:25 PM Janek Kozicki via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
How about this :)
Mateusz Loskot via Boost said: (by the date of Sat, 22 Aug 2020
20:46:16 +0200)
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?
If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)
One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules.
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
As far as I am concerned, the review manager must have deep understanding of the problem domain and not be in a position to gain from either acceptance or rejection. The review wizards' approval certifies that that's the case. Technically, as long as it _is_ the case, I don't see why a wizard can't be a manager.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 1:08 PM Emil Dotchevski via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
As far as I am concerned, the review manager must have deep understanding of the problem domain and not be in a position to gain from either acceptance or rejection
When good libraries go into Boost, everyone gains! Thanks
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:46, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 20:38, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Vinnie, please stop posting messages with clickbait or obscure topics. This is not going to help you find a review manager, quite the opposite.
My DEEPEST apologies for the transgression. But maybe... just a thought here, you could forgive me seeing as to how I have been asking for a review manager for 10 months now?
If a review manager can submit a review, precedents in the past are known, then, perhaps, a review wizard can be a review manager ;)
One way or another, I believe there is room for further clarification of the review rules.
I proposed it here https://github.com/boostorg/website/pull/534 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 07:57:16 -0700, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
But Boost.JSON needs a Review Manager! Don't be shy now!
Christian Mazakas replied to your previous message (the 'Shallow Hal Needs A Gal!' one) to say he would do it. Maybe it would be an idea to respond to his message ? Spencer
participants (7)
-
Andrey Semashev -
Emil Dotchevski -
Janek Kozicki -
Mateusz Loskot -
Robert Ramey -
Spencer Collyer -
Vinnie Falco