Hi, Msm has been in the Vault since a few months now and has been downloaded quite a few times, so it looks like there is interest in such a state machine framework, but I would prefer to be sure before requesting a formal review. So my question is, is there interest from the Boost community in Msm becoming part of Boost? Regards, Christophe
on Fri Jan 23 2009, Christophe Henry <christophe.j.henry-AT-googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Msm has been in the Vault since a few months now and has been downloaded quite a few times, so it looks like there is interest in such a state machine framework, but I would prefer to be sure before requesting a formal review. So my question is, is there interest from the Boost community in Msm becoming part of Boost?
+1 :-) -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:58:08 +0100, Christophe Henry <christophe.j.henry@googlemail.com> wrote:
Msm has been in the Vault since a few months now and has been downloaded quite a few times, so it looks like there is interest in such a state machine framework, but I would prefer to be sure before requesting a formal review. So my question is, is there interest from the Boost community in Msm becoming part of Boost?
I think there is. :] -- Edouard
Christophe Henry wrote:
Hi,
Msm has been in the Vault since a few months now and has been downloaded quite a few times, so it looks like there is interest in such a state machine framework, but I would prefer to be sure before requesting a formal review. So my question is, is there interest from the Boost community in Msm becoming part of Boost?
Definitely! I'm hoping it does. As Christophe knows, I'm using msm to handle what 'was' a complicated selection mechanism in our app. So far it's working very well for a flat state_machine, and will soon factor out quite a bit into composite state machine. jeff
Christophe Henry wrote:
Hi,
Msm has been in the Vault since a few months now and has been downloaded quite a few times, so it looks like there is interest in such a state machine framework, but I would prefer to be sure before requesting a formal review. So my question is, is there interest from the Boost community in Msm becoming part of Boost?
Downloaded it a while back. Planning to use it to manage our application state whether it gets included in Boost or not. -- Michael Marcin
Hi Christophe, for a customer I have to use state machines on an embedded device. Msm would be very helpful here. If Msm get part of Boost it would be an argument to convince my customer to use Msm instead of other state machine frameworks. Best regards, Franz PS: Msm works very well on 324 MHz MIPS :-) -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] Im Auftrag von Christophe Henry Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009 14:58 An: boost@lists.boost.org Betreff: [boost] [msm] Gauging interest Hi, Msm has been in the Vault since a few months now and has been downloaded quite a few times, so it looks like there is interest in such a state machine framework, but I would prefer to be sure before requesting a formal review. So my question is, is there interest from the Boost community in Msm becoming part of Boost? Regards, Christophe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
participants (6)
-
Christophe Henry -
David Abrahams -
Edouard A. -
Franz Alt -
Jeff Flinn -
Michael Marcin