RE: [boost] Re: Yo, move semantics anyone?
David Abrahams wrote:
I'm just wondering if the deafening silence indicates a lack of interest or whether something else is going on?
The latter. Thanks for your efforts, I for my part will definitely have a closer look on it when time allows.
Stephan wrote:
BTW, what was the result of the proposal on clarification of this?
Dave went to Sidney and pitched it. It passed as a Defect Report which is great news as it means that the current crop of compilers are required to fix this now not in N years when the C++0X standard is released. Yours, -Gary-
"Powell, Gary" <powellg@amazon.com> writes:
Actually I just found out that the CWG is considering two possible resolutions to issue 291: one is my proposal, and the other (which I favor) simply prohibits compilers from ever copying class rvalues. Doesn't matter, though: my library will work in the meantime. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
participants (2)
-
David Abrahams -
Powell, Gary