On 11/13/18 17:42, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

...

Marshall Clow wrote:

...

The release candidates for the first 1.69.0 beta release are now > available at:

https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.69.0.beta.1.rc1/source/

A change in Boost.Function, https://github.com/boostorg/function/pull/25, has caused an unfortunate regression downstream (in FreeBSD) as reported in https://github.com/boostorg/program_options/issues/65.

I think that it would be best to revert the Boost.Function change before releasing the beta.

I reverted this change on the develop branch and I'd like to merge that to master before the beta.

Looks good to me. Please merge. -- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com

On 11/13/18 15:16, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:37 PM Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...

The release candidates for the first 1.69.0 beta release are now available at:

...

...

As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

I'd like to ask for permission to merge this commit to master:

https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/commit/7dc1712f2df87f28bfd02ab26d3af2...

It fixes Boost.Filesystem compilation on QNX.

We don't have any QNX testers running. Which targets/environments have you compiled for? -- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:10 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

On 11/14/18 5:01 AM, Michael Caisse via Boost wrote:

...

On 11/13/18 15:16, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

...

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 6:37 PM Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...

The release candidates for the first 1.69.0 beta release are now

available

...

at: ... As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.

I'd like to ask for permission to merge this commit to master:

https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/commit/7dc1712f2df87f28bfd02ab26d3af2...

...

It fixes Boost.Filesystem compilation on QNX.

We don't have any QNX testers running. Which targets/environments have you compiled for?

I have not. The fix comes from a user who has tested that it works.

https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/issues/89

It doesn't affect any other platforms, so I consider it rather safe.

I think that this can wait until after the beta. -- Marshall

On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:46 PM Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

On 11/14/18 7:07 PM, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:

...

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:10 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:

...

On 11/14/18 5:01 AM, Michael Caisse via Boost wrote:

...

On 11/13/18 15:16, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

...

I'd like to ask for permission to merge this commit to master:

https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/commit/7dc1712f2df87f28bfd02ab26d3af2...

...

...

...

It fixes Boost.Filesystem compilation on QNX.

We don't have any QNX testers running. Which targets/environments have you compiled for?

I have not. The fix comes from a user who has tested that it works.

https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/issues/89

It doesn't affect any other platforms, so I consider it rather safe.

I think that this can wait until after the beta.

Can I merge this change now?

Yes. -- Marshall

On 14/11/2018 15:38, Jan Beich via Boost wrote:

Marshall Clow via Boost-users writes:

...

The release candidates for the first 1.69.0 beta release are now available As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy. On FreeBSD a number of Boost consumers don't build due to these: https://github.com/boostorg/regex/issues/72

That issue relates to something that we have never supported: building a library with one compiler and then using with another. At the very least it is not a new issue. John. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 14/11/2018 18:20, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

John Maddock wrote:

...

...

https://github.com/boostorg/regex/issues/72

That issue relates to something that we have never supported: building a library with one compiler and then using with another.

It's more like we've always supported it, but didn't know that we did until it broke. :-)

Really?  There have been no code changes, it's always been this, and I've always assumed that this would not work. John. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus