Hello, I've started implementing SCTP support in asio. I would like some feedback on what methodology is preferred. Although I had originally wanted to provide SCTP support as a pure add-on to the current framework, unfortunately, I don't think that can be done. For example, SCTP supports multi-homed endpoints, and the standard API provides a function sctp_bindx which can add and remove endpoint addresses from an active association (connection). While I can provide a subclass of socket_acceptor_service with this extended interface, there is no way of changing the wrapper (detail::reactive_socket_service) used to implement socket_acceptor_service's service_impl_type, and since socket_, protocol_, etc. are private members of detail::reactive_socket_service, I think that there is no way a subclass of socket_acceptor_service can access the underlying socket object. This seems to leave two options: 1. Patch the missing functionality into the existing classes. What worries me is that this approach does not seem to "scale" well with respect to the addition of new protocols. (what happens if someone needs TIPC support, for example). 2. Provide some kind of protocol-specific extension mechanism (templated base classes for example) for detail::reactive_socket_service and other such classes so that it is possible to provide protocol-specific extensions to the base asio interface. Does anyone have a preference on how I proceed? (or is there an option I've missed?) And if some extension mechanism is desired, is there a preference on the technique used for its implementation? Thank you in advance, Hal Finkel P.S. For anyone looking for a quick introduction to SCTP and its associated socket API, I've found HP's SCTP Programmer's Guide (http://docs.hp.com/en/5992-4578/index.html) to be pretty good.