Google SOC projects (Boost Process/Tree) etc.
Hi, As far as I know some interesting libraries have cropped up from SOC into the boost vault. See http://code.google.com/soc/boost/about.html What is the status of these libraries in terms of submissions, reviews etc. Why don't they show up in the sandbox? I am mostly interested in: * boost.process * boost.tree Thanks Shams
On 10/5/06, shams <shams@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
As far as I know some interesting libraries have cropped up from SOC into the boost vault. See http://code.google.com/soc/boost/about.html
What is the status of these libraries in terms of submissions, reviews etc.
Why don't they show up in the sandbox?
In the case of Boost.Bimap, I will continue to use the Boost SoC svn for a while. We (Joaquin is helping me) are currently working in the final details looking for a formal review. Since the last informal review, I have updated the library. You can play with the new version here: http://cablemodem.fibertel.com.ar/mcape/oss/projects/mc_projects/boost_proje... The main differences are: * A new set type has been added: unconstrained_set_of, that completes the framework. * Thanks to Paul Giacome the docs are a lot better now. Best Regards Matias
shams wrote:
As far as I know some interesting libraries have cropped up from SOC into the boost vault. See http://code.google.com/soc/boost/about.html
What is the status of these libraries in terms of submissions, reviews etc.
Why don't they show up in the sandbox?
Not sure why they would have to show up in the sandbox. They are all available in the Boost Consulting SVN server, previously mentioned on this list.
I am mostly interested in: * boost.process * boost.tree
Can't speak for the process project, but the tree project is still progressing and you can see the progress in the trunk branch of SVN. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Rene Rivera said: (by the date of Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:21:02 -0500)
Can't speak for the process project, but the tree project is still progressing and you can see the progress in the trunk branch of SVN.
- Boost uses subversion? No. - Are there two copies of boost trunk ? - Did you mistakenly written SVN instead of CVS ? -- Janek Kozicki |
Janek Kozicki wrote:
Rene Rivera said: (by the date of Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:21:02 -0500)
Can't speak for the process project, but the tree project is still progressing and you can see the progress in the trunk branch of SVN.
- Boost uses subversion? No.
Correct... Not yet.
- Are there two copies of boost trunk ?
No.
- Did you mistakenly written SVN instead of CVS ?
No. I was careful to refer to the Boost Consulting SVN. See the wiki site for info <https://boost-consulting.com:8443/trac/soc/wiki>. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
On 10/5/06, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure why they would have to show up in the sandbox. They are all available in the Boost Consulting SVN server, previously mentioned on this list.
I see the Trac pages, which are nice for browsing, but what is the SVN repository URL for anonymous "svn checkout" operations, if there is one? It might be nice to announce this information more publicly if so. Or maybe I missed it. -- Caleb Epstein
Caleb Epstein wrote:
On 10/5/06, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure why they would have to show up in the sandbox. They are all available in the Boost Consulting SVN server, previously mentioned on this list.
I see the Trac pages, which are nice for browsing, but what is the SVN repository URL for anonymous "svn checkout" operations, if there is one? It might be nice to announce this information more publicly if so. Or maybe I missed it.
Not sure if you missed it... All I rmember is that it got mentioned at one point in the list. Anyway it's <https://boost-consulting.com:8443/svn/main/boost/soc/2006>. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
On 10/5/06, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://boost-consulting.com:8443/svn/main/boost/soc/2006>.
Excellent, thanks! -- Caleb Epstein
On 10/6/06, shams <shams@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know some interesting libraries have cropped up from SOC into the boost vault. See http://code.google.com/soc/boost/about.html
What is the status of these libraries in terms of submissions, reviews etc.
Why don't they show up in the sandbox?
I am mostly interested in: * boost.process * boost.tree
Boost.Process is still progressing, albeit slowly. I published a 0.1 version when SoC finished and uploaded it to the sandbox, but a lot of changes have gone into the SVN tree since then. (Well, strictly speaking, it was untouched for around a month and I've got back to hacking it only a week ago... but some university-related projects are interfering.) You should be able to use 0.1 in your projects already, and maybe try your hands on the code in the repository (but don't count on it working regularly). It might not be the cleanest API (it certainly is not, yet), but it currently works in several platforms ;-) There is still a bunch of work to do (see the "pending.qbk" file in the library's "doc" subdirectory) before it can be presented for revision. (FYI I'm now investigating a much-delayed item: the integration with Boost.Asio). Kind regards, -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com> The Julipedia - http://julipedia.blogspot.com/
shams wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know some interesting libraries have cropped up from SOC into the boost vault. See http://code.google.com/soc/boost/about.html
What is the status of these libraries in terms of submissions, reviews etc.
Why don't they show up in the sandbox?
I am mostly interested in: * boost.process * boost.tree
Sorry for replying late. I'm the author of boost.coroutine. The library is mostly finished. I need to finish the code reference documentation and a couple of final touches here an there. Unfortunately (well, may be fortunately :) ) I've have begun a full time job as a programmer (the SoC really helped), so it will take a while until the library will be review worthy. -- Giovanni P. Deretta
Hi Shams, sorry for beeing late, too. The thread just popped up from Giovanni's reply... 2006/10/6, shams <shams@orcon.net.nz>: [snip]
What is the status of these libraries in terms of submissions, reviews etc.
There's a little improvement I want to see included in the kolmogorov_maxflow: The merge of a version which doesn't use edges to specify capacities to source/sink nodes, but uses property maps for those instead (saves a lot of edges for some type of graphs). That's what I'm currently doing.. Cheers, Stephan
participants (8)
-
Caleb Epstein -
Giovanni P. Deretta -
Janek Kozicki -
Julio M. Merino Vidal -
Matias Capeletto -
Rene Rivera -
shams -
Stephan Diederich