Darren,

Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:27:08 +0100 From: "Darren Garvey" <lists.drrngrvy@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [boost] [GSoC][cgi] Status update. To: boost@lists.boost.org

*snip*

The thing I've been wondering is about a single library dumping more than one namespace into the boost namespace, so you'd have boost::cgi, boost::fcgi and boost::scgi. I guessed that idea would be shot down in flames though.

*snip* I am not sure what the boost policy or convention for putting stuff into the Boost namespace is but personally I think that having distinct namespaces for each type of protocol makes sense. Logically they are implementing different standards. I know there is some overlap in behaviour and use. Maybe this could be in a boost::cgi::common namespace and be pulled into each of the distinct namespaces. Peter.