Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
----- Mensaje original ----- De: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> Fecha: Viernes, Enero 20, 2006 11:17 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
[...]
position() would be a perfect fit except for one thing: in the roadmapped ranked indices
(http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices)
I will need another member function to return the position ordinal of a given element (that is, the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position" seems also a good candidate.
IMO that should have been "index."
But "index" already has a disparate meaning in the context of Boost.MultiIndex. I need another synonim: ordinal, rank, situation? Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
I will need another member function to return the position ordinal of a given element (that is, the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position" seems also a good candidate.
IMO that should have been "index."
But "index" already has a disparate meaning in the context of Boost.MultiIndex.
I'm not sure that's a problem. But if it is, maybe you should rename the library. I'm only half-kidding: if you can't use index to mean what it usually means in the most basic computer programs, it feels to me like something is wrong.
I need another synonim: ordinal, rank, situation?
I would use ordinal if I had to pick one of those. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
In message <154ba197a9.197a9154ba@tid.es>, JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin@tid.es> writes
----- Mensaje original ----- De: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> Fecha: Viernes, Enero 20, 2006 11:17 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
[...]
position() would be a perfect fit except for one thing: in the roadmapped ranked indices
(http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices)
I will need another member function to return the position ordinal of a given element (that is, the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position" seems also a good candidate.
IMO that should have been "index."
But "index" already has a disparate meaning in the context of Boost.MultiIndex. I need another synonim: ordinal, rank, situation?
"Inverse", "domain_index"? -- Alec Ross
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
----- Mensaje original ----- De: David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> Fecha: Viernes, Enero 20, 2006 11:17 pm Asunto: Re: [boost] [multi_index] intrusive multi_index poll for interest
"JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z" <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
[...]
position() would be a perfect fit except for one thing: in the roadmapped ranked indices
(http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices)
I will need another member function to return the position ordinal of a given element (that is, the inverse of operator[]), and for that "position" seems also a good candidate.
IMO that should have been "index."
But "index" already has a disparate meaning in the context of Boost.MultiIndex. I need another synonim: ordinal, rank, situation?
`ordinate` is more appropriate that `ordinal` IMO, and is a good choice an alternative might otherwise be: `kernel`, but then again many might not like it, and give rise to debate. Cheers, -- Manfred Doudar - Research Engineer National ICT Australia (NICTA) Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering (RSISE) The Australian National University - Canberra, ACT 0200 AUSTRALIA
participants (4)
-
Alec Ross -
David Abrahams -
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z -
Manfred Doudar