Joachim Faulhaber writes:

2010/3/7 Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com>:

...

I was being blunt in order to let you know where I stand. I think the ITL is an interesting library and we may add marshalling support for it at some point. ? My suggestion is to not use the exact same class names in your library as are already used in the standard library. ? With the Boost::Intrusive library there is some of that as well. However, he has a class called ?rbtree that is an alternative to intrusive::(set and multiset). ?That rbtree class I support while for the time being I don't support the intrusive set or multiset. ? ?I'm not familiar enough with your library to know if an itl_rbtree class would be workable, but mention it just in case.

Why not just support the class templates with the names that you like and just ignoring the rest?

I may do that. I was hoping to hear your thoughts on the itl_rbtree idea. Brian Wood http://webEbenezer.net (651) 251-9384