Hi Jeremy, I've been working a little with your hash containers. They should definitely be fast-track reviewed! A small problem: std::distance( m.begin(), m.end() ) != m.size() after I have filled the container (more than 100k elements). Could it be due to some caching thing? best regards Thorsten
I've been working a little with your hash containers. They should definitely be fast-track reviewed!
Let's wait with that until TR1 is voted through (sheduled for the Redmond meeting). There are some extensions/changes proposed for the hash tables and I really hope they get adopted. Once when TR1 is official, we should continue our plans and work towareds a complete TR1 support in boost. Stefan
At 02:32 AM 10/2/2004, Stefan Slapeta wrote:
I've been working a little with your hash containers. They should definitely be fast-track reviewed!
Let's wait with that until TR1 is voted through (sheduled for the Redmond meeting). There are some extensions/changes proposed for the hash tables and I really hope they get adopted.
Once when TR1 is official, we should continue our plans and work towareds a complete TR1 support in boost.
The Redmond C++ committee meeting is later this month, so waiting to see if any hash table changes are makes sense and won't cause a long delay. So I second Stefan's suggestion that we wait until after the Redmond meeting. --Beman
participants (3)
-
Beman Dawes -
Stefan Slapeta -
Thorsten Ottosen