Re: [boost] Re: [website] More "improvements"..

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 05:12 -0700, Jeff Garland wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 23:36:13 -0500, Rene Rivera wrote
[snip]
That is an argument which does not apply to my design. I do not assume any particular pixel size! I only assume that 10 to 12 words per line is the most pleasing line length. That is what centuries of research and experimentation have shown.
Well sorry, but I believe it does. Granted you don't assume a pixel size, but the layout is clearly frozen. The whole context of Nielson's advice isn't on that page. No matter what "I" would like to do in terms of line length, scrolling, etc I can't do it. You've decided the best size for me and I have to adjust to it whether I like it or not...well, obviously I don't like it ;-)
Jeff
I whole heartedly agree with Jeff. It is not an issue of good layout or optimal HCI Design but about user choice. If I choose to have a tall thin browser window because I want most of my screen real estate devoted to an IDE that is *my* choice. But I don't want authors to dictate that I have to scroll or have their fixed width on my browser window. BTW the current boost home page also has a fixed minimum width which IMHO is wrong. /ikh

On 5 Ebr 2005, at 14:25, Iain Hanson wrote:
BTW the current boost home page also has a fixed minimum width which IMHO is wrong.
Mmm, I slightly disagree there. I feel it is fine to enforce a minimum width, provided it is not too wide (say 400-750 pixels). Sometimes you need to enforce max and min widths if you have a more complex design, otherwise it can be hard to to make the content on the page wrap / adjust in a nice/predictable manner. However, with boost, where that is mainly text, a min width can be very small as there is little to break. Jason
participants (2)
-
Iain Hanson
-
Jason Earl