[process] FileSystem version
Hi, with witch version of Boost.FileSystem Boost.Process is working, V2, V3 or both? Best, Vicente
----- Original Message ----- From: "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 11:14 AM Subject: [boost] [process] FileSystem version
Hi,
with witch version of Boost.FileSystem Boost.Process is working, V2, V3 or both?
I have another question. On which compilers and platforms Boost.Process has been tested? Best, Vicente
Vicente Botet wrote:
Hi,
with witch version of Boost.FileSystem Boost.Process is working, V2, V3 or both?
Please, could this information be added to the documentation before review. Others will need it to run the tests. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/process-FileSystem-version-tp3231201p3241... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
PING! Vicente Botet wrote:
Vicente Botet wrote:
Hi,
with witch version of Boost.FileSystem Boost.Process is working, V2, V3 or both?
Please, could this information be added to the documentation before review. Others will need it to run the tests.
Best, Vicente
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/process-FileSystem-version-tp3231201p3260... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 11:14:33 +0100, vicente.botet <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Hi Vicente,
with witch version of Boost.FileSystem Boost.Process is working, V2, V3 or both?
better late than never: I've tested Boost.Process only with Boost.Filesystem v2. However I think it should work with Boost.Filesystem v3, too. So far Boost.Process only uses the exception filesystem_error in find_executable_in_path() if a file can't be found. As we could replace std::string with boost::filesystem::path in some places, we could depend more on Boost.Filesystem in the future. Boris
participants (3)
-
Boris Schaeling -
Vicente Botet -
vicente.botet