Re: [boost] boost::interprocess boost::interprocess xsi_shared_memory
El 12/01/2011 19:48, Daniel Neuberger escribió:
Hi Ion,
I saw that you made a commit for XSI shared memory (https:// svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/67451). Could you confirm whether it is ready to use? We're using Boost 1.43; do you think applying that changeset would be sufficient to be able to use XSI shared memory?
Yes, I think it will be enough.
Lastly, do you think these changes will make it into the upcoming 1.46 release?
Yes, I see tests are ok. It seems that in FreeBSD 64 we have some ENOSYS error ("function not implemented"), but there is not much we can do if the platform does not support it ;-) I will merge to release ASAP, please it would be nice if you could test these new XSI functions to get more feedback. Best, Ion
Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga <at> gmail.com> writes:
I will merge to release ASAP, please it would be nice if you could test these new XSI functions to get more feedback.
Thanks Ion. I will begin testing this soon and report back. - Daniel
Ion Gaztañaga<igaztanaga<at> gmail.com> writes:
I will merge to release ASAP, please it would be nice if you could test these new XSI functions to get more feedback.
Hi Ion, Just a preliminary report: I have done some basic tests similar to your examples and everything seems to work great so far. I'm using the release branch for testing. Once 1.46 is released next week, I'll be writing some additional libraries and tests and will give additional feedback then. Also, I think I found a couple of mistakes in the documentation. A patch is attached. Thanks! - Daniel
El 01/02/2011 22:36, Daniel Neuberger escribió:
Ion Gaztañaga<igaztanaga<at> gmail.com> writes:
I will merge to release ASAP, please it would be nice if you could test these new XSI functions to get more feedback.
Hi Ion,
Just a preliminary report:
I have done some basic tests similar to your examples and everything seems to work great so far. I'm using the release branch for testing.
Once 1.46 is released next week, I'll be writing some additional libraries and tests and will give additional feedback then.
Also, I think I found a couple of mistakes in the documentation. A patch is attached.
Thanks for the patch! Best, Ion
participants (2)
-
Daniel Neuberger -
Ion Gaztañaga