[Review][Bimap] Reviewers needed for Bimap review
Hi to all, Bimap review started 5 days ago and we're having some good comments but no thorough reviews. I would like to encourage people to write a Bimap review, because we still have five more days and I would propose extending that if that's necessary. Container and STL experts, we need you! I think that Bimap is a great library and I'm pretty sure you'll be happy to review it once you start reading the docs. Start reading the documentation here: http://tinyurl.com/y95qng And download the library here: http://boost-consulting.com/vault/index.php?&directory=Containers Regards, Ion
"Ion Gaztañaga" <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote in message news:45DB24B0.7080901@gmail.com...
I think that Bimap is a great library and I'm pretty sure you'll be happy to review it once you start reading the docs.
I've started. Docs looks ..... um ... kinda too colorfull and pretty (uncommon for boost at least). I end up looking on all the pictures (like in museum) instead of reading the text ;)) But I'll give it another try ;) Gennadiy
On 2/20/07, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi to all,
Bimap review started 5 days ago and we're having some good comments but no thorough reviews. I would like to encourage people to write a Bimap review, because we still have five more days and I would propose extending that if that's necessary. Container and STL experts, we need you!
I would like to do a review, but unfortunately I won't have the time till the second half of next week. A review extension would be great. Giovanni P. Deretta
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
On 2/20/07, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi to all,
Bimap review started 5 days ago and we're having some good comments but no thorough reviews. I would like to encourage people to write a Bimap review, because we still have five more days and I would propose extending that if that's necessary. Container and STL experts, we need you!
I'm going to put a review together as soon as I can, but it may take a few days. In the mean time I'd like to encourage others to take a look at this library too: based on what I remember from the earlier versions, this is an interesting library that deserves a thorough review. John Maddock.
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
I would like to do a review, but unfortunately I won't have the time till the second half of next week. A review extension would be great.
Ok. I'll ask for a review extension. The next library to be reviewed is my Intrusive library, so I'd be glad to delay my library review to give more time to reviewers. Regards, Ion
Ion Gaztañaga ha escrito:
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
I would like to do a review, but unfortunately I won't have the time till the second half of next week. A review extension would be great.
Ok. I'll ask for a review extension. The next library to be reviewed is my Intrusive library, so I'd be glad to delay my library review to give more time to reviewers.
As review manager for the Intrusive library, I've got no objections to that review being delayed, if it's also OK with the wizards. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
On 2/21/07, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> wrote:
Ion Gaztañaga ha escrito:
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
I would like to do a review, but unfortunately I won't have the time till the second half of next week. A review extension would be great.
Ok. I'll ask for a review extension. The next library to be reviewed is my Intrusive library, so I'd be glad to delay my library review to give more time to reviewers.
As review manager for the Intrusive library, I've got no objections to that review being delayed, if it's also OK with the wizards.
Thanks Ion! Thanks Joaquin! Best Regards Matias Capeletto
"Ion Gaztañaga" <igaztanaga@gmail.com> wrote in message news:45DC8261.3020502@gmail.com...
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
I would like to do a review, but unfortunately I won't have the time till the second half of next week. A review extension would be great.
Ok. I'll ask for a review extension. The next library to be reviewed is my Intrusive library, so I'd be glad to delay my library review to give more time to reviewers.
An extension would be great ;) The first time Matias presented the library I looked at it in detail, and even though I was already sure that I would vote to accept it, there were a couple of details that 'felt' odd. It took me some time to grasp the bottom of oddity I felt, and it will take even more to articulate it in a useful way (...specially since I have to recall what was it :). So, I vote to accept it, but I'll write a deeper review when I have the time, hopefully early next week. (I'm always in a steady rush, but these days more than ever as I'm managing our move to a much bigger house) Best Fernando Cacciola
participants (7)
-
Fernando Cacciola -
Gennadiy Rozental -
Giovanni Piero Deretta -
Ion Gaztañaga -
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz -
John Maddock -
Matias Capeletto