Neal Becker skrev:

The (recent svn) docs for range talk about boost_range_{begin,end,size}. Should't that be just range_{begin,end,size}?

I guess it should. I plan to use some time on my boost libs next week, so be patient, please. As for this issue, then I think we should not change the ADL function name to range_begin() etc, simply because the old name has been used for so long now for various reason. Thus I plan to change the main trunk back to 1.34's names. As for the docs, then people from the documentation projects have most kindly translated the range docs into quickboc, and I will add those soon (I tried a while back to install quickbook and all its dependencies, but gave up after anights work). cheers -Thorsten

Method 2: provide free-standing functions and specialize metafunctions This procedure assumes that you cannot (or do not wish to) change the types that should be made conformant to a Range concept. If this is not true, see method 1. The primary templates in this library are implemented such that certain functions are found via argument-dependent-lookup (ADL). Below is given an overview of which free-standing functions a class must specify to be useable as a certain Range concept. Let x be a variable (const or mutable) of the class in question. Function Related concept boost_range_begin(x) Single Pass Range boost_range_end(x) Single Pass Range boost_range_size(x) Forward Range boost_range_begin() and boost_range_end() must be overloaded for both const and mutable reference arguments.

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost