[accumulators] misprint in accumulators users guide
19 Dec
2008
19 Dec
'08
3:44 p.m.
The example under 'Defining a New Feature' says: typedef impl::mean_accumulator< mpl::_1 > impl; I think it needs to say: typedef accumulators::impl::mean_accumulator< mpl::_1 > impl;
19 Dec
19 Dec
5:25 p.m.
Neal Becker wrote:
The example under 'Defining a New Feature' says: typedef impl::mean_accumulator< mpl::_1 > impl;
I think it needs to say: typedef accumulators::impl::mean_accumulator< mpl::_1 > impl;
Does gcc complain about the changing meaning of "impl" here? I've seen it complain about similar code before. I'll make the change, thanks. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
6021
Age (days ago)
6021
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Eric Niebler -
Neal Becker