Re: [boost] Boost Subject: Re: a 100% lock-free PDR algorithm for Boost, no
From: "Chris Thomasson" <cristom@comcast.net> Subject: Re: [boost] a 100% lock-free PDR algorithm for Boost, no patent issues... To: boost@lists.boost.org Message-ID: <ekbd9l$5u8$1@sea.gmane.org>
... Do a patent search on lock-free...
Lawyers have advised me not to read patents, as knowingly violating a patent is a worse crime than unknowingly doing so. So it might even be a bad idea for me to read about your soon-to-be-patent-pending ideas.
"Greg Colvin" <greg@colvin.org> wrote in message news:200611261808.kAQI8xwa002839@rs34.luxsci.com...
From: "Chris Thomasson" <cristom@comcast.net> Subject: Re: [boost] a 100% lock-free PDR algorithm for Boost, no patent issues... To: boost@lists.boost.org Message-ID: <ekbd9l$5u8$1@sea.gmane.org>
... Do a patent search on lock-free...
Lawyers have advised me not to read patents, as knowingly violating a patent is a worse crime than unknowingly doing so.
How is somebody going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you read a patent for sure? Even if you did a patent search, you might of just read the Abstracts, and not any of the teachings... How to prove? P.S. -- vZOOM is different from the collector code I posted:
participants (2)
-
Chris Thomasson -
Greg Colvin