Re: [boost] Boost documentation

Le dimanche 24 juin 2007 à 11:04 +0200, Cédric Venet a écrit :
It's easy now, when you've got very limited number of users. This will change with widespread application of this format. And to be completely frank with you how easy it is to support the tools for you is comparatively minor part of my concern. After all it's your own decision. The fact remains: someone need to support it. Someone need to test it. Someone need to documents it.
The fact is if one day, quick book is broken and not supported anymore, you just have to use the last correct version to convert your quickbook doc into docbook and work on the doc book.
As far as I understand it, a short term goal of the quickbook developers is actually to get rid of the conversion to boostbook/docbook. So it won't be as easy as you make it sound to get back to a docbook version. Please correct me if docbook is still intended to be a mandatory intermediate stage between quickbook and html/pdf documentations. Best regards, Guillaume

De : Guillaume Melquiond
Le dimanche 24 juin 2007 à 11:04 +0200, Cédric Venet a écrit :
The fact is if one day, quick book is broken and not supported anymore, you just have to use the last correct version to convert your quickbook doc into docbook and work on the doc book.
As far as I understand it, a short term goal of the quickbook developers is actually to get rid of the conversion to boostbook/docbook. So it won't be as easy as you make it sound to get back to a docbook version.
Yes, I remember something like this.
Please correct me if docbook is still intended to be a mandatory intermediate stage between quickbook and html/pdf documentations.
I can't speak for quickbook developers, but it could be useful to have a backend in boostbook or docbook, even if it is not anymore used as an intermediate stage. This involve some development cost, but à priori not too much. It could be useful if someone want to use a custom xslt for his doc (in case of use outside boost, since they try to make a common L&F for boost) or for the sake of having a standardized xml backend. After it depend on the scope of use they want to give to quickbook. -- Cédric Venet
participants (2)
-
Cédric Venet
-
Guillaume Melquiond