We still have a bunch of failures in Sandia test results for intel-linux-9.0. The number of failures seem to went down since last time I looked, however: 1. There are still failures present here that are not present in Martin's result. 2. Some of failures, like: http://tinyurl.com/2b7m5p, indicate that system Python library is build somewhat differently than usually. 3. This set of test results seem to have appeared after we've agreed that no new test runners should be added. Given that above, I'm not sure there's point to look into those issues. Any objections? - Volodya