Boost regression notification (2005-09-27 [HEAD])

Boost regression test failures ------------------------------ Report time: 2005-09-27T05:00:25Z This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms. Detailed report: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/issues.... 88 failures in 8 libraries: bind (14) concept_check (10) graph (1) mpl (1) parameter (12) serialization (33) typeof (16) wave (1) |bind| bind_rv_sp_test: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux gcc-3.3.6-linux gcc-3.4.4-linux gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos mingw-3_4_2 mem_fn_rv_test: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux gcc-3.3.6-linux gcc-3.4.4-linux gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos mingw-3_4_2 |concept_check| stl_concept_covering: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux gcc-3.3.6-linux gcc-3.4.4-linux gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin intel-win32-9_0 mingw-3_4_2 vc-7_1 |graph| graphviz_test: vc-7_1 |mpl| size_t: gcc-4_0-darwin |parameter| basics: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux efficiency: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux gcc-4_0-darwin macros: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux sfinae: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux unnamed: gcc-2.95.3-linux gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux vc-7_1 |serialization| test_class_info_load_binary_archive: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_binary_archive_dll: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_text_archive: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_text_archive_dll: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_text_warchive: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_text_warchive_dll: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_xml_archive: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_xml_archive_dll: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_xml_warchive: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_class_info_load_xml_warchive_dll: gcc-3_3-darwin gcc-3_4_3-sunos gcc-4_0-darwin test_polymorphic_xml_archive_dll: vc-7_1 test_polymorphic_xml_warchive: vc-7_1 test_polymorphic_xml_warchive_dll: vc-7_1 |typeof| data_member_native: intel-win32-9_0 function_native: intel-win32-9_0 function_ptr_native: intel-win32-9_0 function_ref_native: intel-win32-9_0 lvalue_native: intel-win32-9_0 member_function_native: intel-win32-9_0 modifiers_native: intel-win32-9_0 noncopyable_native: intel-win32-9_0 std_native: intel-win32-9_0 template_dependent_native: intel-win32-9_0 template_enum_native: intel-win32-9_0 template_int_native: intel-win32-9_0 template_multiword_native: intel-win32-9_0 template_tpl_native: intel-win32-9_0 template_type_native: intel-win32-9_0 type_native: intel-win32-9_0 |wave| testwave: gcc-3.3.6-linux

"Douglas Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> wrote
Boost regression test failures ------------------------------ Report time: 2005-09-27T05:00:25Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/issues.... I am sorry to be annoying about the issue, but am I the only one who thinks the regression system is behaving somewhat strange lately? First I can't find results for the test I had defined, and now the number of columns (toolsets) has substantially decreased... Maybe it all has a simple explanation, like switching resources, etc.? Can anybody please shed some light on it? Thanks, Arkadiy

On Sep 27, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
"Douglas Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> wrote
Boost regression test failures ------------------------------ Report time: 2005-09-27T05:00:25Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/ developer/issues.html
I am sorry to be annoying about the issue, but am I the only one who thinks the regression system is behaving somewhat strange lately? First I can't find results for the test I had defined, and now the number of columns (toolsets) has substantially decreased... Maybe it all has a simple explanation, like switching resources, etc.? Can anybody please shed some light on it?
I deleted a bunch of ancient test results :) Doug

"Douglas Gregor" <doug.gregor@gmail.com> wrote
On Sep 27, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
"Douglas Gregor" <dgregor@cs.indiana.edu> wrote
Boost regression test failures ------------------------------ Report time: 2005-09-27T05:00:25Z
This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Detailed report:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/ developer/issues.html
I am sorry to be annoying about the issue, but am I the only one who thinks the regression system is behaving somewhat strange lately? First I can't find results for the test I had defined, and now the number of columns (toolsets) has substantially decreased... Maybe it all has a simple explanation, like switching resources, etc.? Can anybody please shed some light on it?
I deleted a bunch of ancient test results :)
OK, thanks. But I still can't understand why the test added on 9/20 would be missing from the regression table... Regards, Arkadiy

Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/issues....
I am sorry to be annoying about the issue, but am I the only one who thinks the regression system is behaving somewhat strange lately? First I can't find results for the test I had defined, and now the number of columns (toolsets) has substantially decreased... Maybe it all has a simple explanation, like switching resources, etc.? Can anybody please shed some light on it?
Testing resources currently are split among the CVS HEAD and the RC_1_33_0 branch. Someone kindly removed very outdated results from testers who now run tests on the RC side from the HEAD tables. This is the decrease you observed. Once Boost 1.33.1 has been released, the testing resources will get thrown on HEAD completely again. I don't know anything about the other problem you mention (I'm on the RC side of the testing world). HTH, m Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
participants (4)
-
Arkadiy Vertleyb
-
Douglas Gregor
-
Douglas Gregor
-
Martin Wille