For numeric code these functions are indispensible but, since they're C99, they are technically C++ verboten. It seems to me that it would be worthwhile to add them to boost::math - they could probably just be cut-n-pasted from the C99 gcc headers... Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- Matthias Schabel, Ph.D. Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research 729 Arapeen Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84108 801-587-9413 (work) 801-585-3592 (fax) 801-706-5760 (cell) 801-484-0811 (home) mschabel at ucair med utah edu
Le jeu 04/03/2004 à 17:53, Matthias Schabel a écrit :
For numeric code these functions are indispensible but, since they're C99, they are technically C++ verboten. It seems to me that it would be worthwhile to add them to boost::math - they could probably just be cut-n-pasted from the C99 gcc headers...
Matthias
I won't repeat one more time on this mailing-list my opinion on the C99 mathematical and floating-point functions. However I want to point out (since nobody else did it) that it is impossible to simply "cut-n-past from the C99 GCC headers". Indeed Boost and the GNU C Library do not share the same license. Moreover the problem becomes platform- and compiler-dependent if you want to handle the long double type (is it 8, 10, 12 or 16 bytes long?) for example. So it is a lot more work than just copy-pasting some headers. Regards, Guillaume
At 03:19 PM 3/4/2004, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
Le jeu 04/03/2004 à 17:53, Matthias Schabel a écrit :
For numeric code these functions are indispensible but, since they're C99, they are technically C++ verboten. It seems to me that it would be worthwhile to add them to boost::math - they could probably just be cut-n-pasted from the C99 gcc headers...
Matthias
I won't repeat one more time on this mailing-list my opinion on the C99 mathematical and floating-point functions. However I want to point out (since nobody else did it) that it is impossible to simply "cut-n-past from the C99 GCC headers". Indeed Boost and the GNU C Library do not share the same license. Moreover the problem becomes platform- and compiler-dependent if you want to handle the long double type (is it 8, 10, 12 or 16 bytes long?) for example. So it is a lot more work than just copy-pasting some headers.
Have you seen "Proposed additions to TR-1 to improve compatibility with C99" http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1568.htm? Unless there is some unforeseen problem, C99 functions will become part of the Library TR. The technical work on the TR is due to be completed this coming October. I'm not sure if anyone would want to go to all the effort of providing these functions for Boost when they know that TR1 implementations would probably marginalize the Boost versions. --Beman
participants (3)
-
Beman Dawes -
Guillaume Melquiond -
Matthias Schabel