Re: [boost] [review] hash functions

19 Mar
2005
19 Mar
'05
5:21 p.m.
In-Reply-To: <003a01c52a54$a90c6b30$6601a8c0@pdimov> pdimov@mmltd.net (Peter Dimov) wrote (abridged):
I do appreciate the benefits of stability. What isn't clear is whether it trumps hash quality. This is a judgement call, in that it partly depends on which issue is more important to you.
Both issues are important to me.
They conflict. There is a tradeoff between them. So we have to choose which is more important. I was concerned partly that the wrong choice might be made, but mostly because the tradeoff wasn't even being acknowledged. -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK
7394
Age (days ago)
7394
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
brangdon@cix.compulink.co.uk