Hi Darryl,

Anyway, I hope that clarifies my concern is not primarily with the failure to compile on older gcc versions.

Yes it does and it's a good point.

I can accept eUML as an experimental library.... Does that help?

Yes, I think it's a good term and I'll put it like this in the doc with a word of explanation about compilers and fsm size.

Oh - I also neglected to suggest that a better name for euml is badly needed

I like the name eUML. "Embedded UML" is really what it wants to be, UML syntax in the code. Besides you know by now my taste for names which sound cool ;-) Of course, if you find some really cool name... Christophe