All, Just a reminder that the Tim Blechmann's Heap library is being reviewed. The more reviewers we have, the higher quality libraries we get :) The review is scheduled to end today, but I'd like to extend it through the Monday (June 12) because a) I announced it 2 days late and b) I'd like to solicit more feedback on the library. Andrew
The review is scheduled to end today, but I'd like to extend it through the Monday (June 12) because a) I announced it 2 days late and b) I'd like to solicit more feedback on the library.
i would also like to ask reviewers to clearly state if they accept or reject boost.heap. thanks, tim
hi all, i do have a few questions regarding the integration of boost.heap into boost: * i am using assertions. some of them verify the internal logic, some should verify the correct usage. at the moment, the internal logic will be verified only if BOOST_HEAP_SANITYCHECK is defined. is this reasonable? and shall i use BOOST_ASSERT or assert for that? * shall the sanity checks be enabled for running the unit tests? * what is the preferred way to implement compile-time dispatching? (a) adding static const flags to the class definition, (b) deriving from a special `tag' class and use is_base_of or (c) implementing a separate `traits' class. at the moment i am using (a), but maybe there is a convention? thanks, tim
participants (2)
-
Andrew Sutton -
Tim Blechmann