On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:

Den 04-09-2017 kl. 18:50 skrev Glen Fernandes via Boost:

...

A review date for Double_Ended was never published on the schedule. The last state on that library on the review schedule was:

Submission: Double-Ended Submitter: Benedek Thaler Review Manager: Needed Review Dates: -

This was before all unscheduled reviews were purged from the schedule.

I long ago (11th of May) contacted the review wizards:

http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html#Wizard

Only John replied, and he agreed to setting the date. After some time, I asked if I had to update the review schedule (this is 26th of June), but John said he would do it.

Are there review wizards that are not mentioned in the above page?

The page is still accurate. There was probably some disconnect between the two wizards, because nobody else had any idea that Double-Ended even had a review manager, let alone was scheduled for this week. Glen

Hi John, Fit received quite a bit of attention recently on the ML, it wouldn't be fair to steal the show. The schedule is empty otherwise - given that DoubleEnded is sitting there for years, a few more days wouldn't hurt. Thanks, Benedek On Sep 6, 2017 08:04, "John Phillips" wrote: Thorsten, This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we start by adding a week to the duration for each review (to give people who want to participate in both time to do so) and run them as scheduled. Both Fit and Double Ended did the right thing, and I made a mistake, so I don't want to penalize either in any way if possible. John On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

Hi All,

I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review, running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon with John (Phillips).

Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html it seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.

Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?

kind regards

Thorsten

Den 06-09-2017 kl. 08:17 skrev John Phillips:

  But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.

Taking September 18th as a starting date works for both me and Benedek. So I suggest that we reschedule to 18th to 28th of September. kind regards Thorsten -- Best regards, Thorsten Jørgen Ottosen, Ph.D. Director of Research +45 23308797 Dezide (www.dezide.com)

Thorsten, Does September 21-30 work for you and Benedek? It is a good idea to keep a small buffer between reviews, especially in case an extension is needed. Best, Ron

On Sep 8, 2017, at 7:18 AM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:

Den 06-09-2017 kl. 09:15 skrev Thorsten Ottosen via Boost:

...

Den 06-09-2017 kl. 08:17 skrev John Phillips:

...

But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.

Taking September 18th as a starting date works for both me and Benedek. So I suggest that we reschedule to 18th to 28th of September.

John,

Please confirm that you saw this message. In case you need links, then the git repos is:

https://github.com/erenon/double_ended

and documentation here:

http://erenon.hu/double_ended/

kind regards

Thorsten

_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Den 09-09-2017 kl. 16:36 skrev Benedek Thaler via Boost:

On Sep 9, 2017 7:16 AM, "Ronald Garcia" wrote:

Thorsten,

Does September 21-30 work for you and Benedek? It is a good idea to keep a small buffer between reviews, especially in case an extension is needed.

Yes, that works for us too. kind regards Thorsten