Sandbox structure (directory level for tags)
These top level directories are found in the repository: sandbox/ sandbox-branches/ sandbox-tags/ And now I found this (yes, I did checkout the sandbox..): sandbox/SOC/2006/concurrency/ branches/ tags/ trunk/ http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/BoostSandbox says that the sandbox should be organized by project. Should sandbox-branches and sandbox-tags be removed to make this more clear? /$
On Jun 17, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
These top level directories are found in the repository: sandbox/ sandbox-branches/ sandbox-tags/
And now I found this (yes, I did checkout the sandbox..): sandbox/SOC/2006/concurrency/ branches/ tags/ trunk/
http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/BoostSandbox says that the sandbox should be organized by project. Should sandbox-branches and sandbox-tags be removed to make this more clear?
Not until everything important from those subdirectories has been moved somewhere else. I know that some of the pieces in there are very active now (e.g., sandbox-branches/boost-cmake). The authors of subdirectories in there could help out by moving away or removing their subdirectories, of course. - Doug
2007/6/17, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>: I know that some of the pieces in there are
very active now (e.g., sandbox-branches/boost-cmake). The authors of subdirectories in there could help out by moving away or removing their subdirectories, of course.
Wasn't the cmake branch moved to sandbox-branches (from sandbox) to get only one version of Boost, when checking out the complete sandbox? /$
On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
2007/6/17, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>: I know that some of the pieces in there are
very active now (e.g., sandbox-branches/boost-cmake). The authors of subdirectories in there could help out by moving away or removing their subdirectories, of course.
Wasn't the cmake branch moved to sandbox-branches (from sandbox) to get only one version of Boost, when checking out the complete sandbox?
Yes. The CMake branch is Boost 1.34.0 + the CMake build system. It was moved to sandbox-branches so that people checking out the complete sandbox would not also end up downloading a complete Boost tree (or, in the original case, several complete Boost trees). - Doug
2007/6/17, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:54 AM, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
2007/6/17, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>:
I know that some of the pieces in there are very active now (e.g., sandbox-branches/boost-cmake). The authors of subdirectories in there could help out by moving away or removing their subdirectories, of course.
Wasn't the cmake branch moved to sandbox-branches (from sandbox) to get only one version of Boost, when checking out the complete sandbox?
Yes. The CMake branch is Boost 1.34.0 + the CMake build system. It was moved to sandbox-branches so that people checking out the complete sandbox would not also end up downloading a complete Boost tree (or, in the original case, several complete Boost trees).
What is the recommendation then? Moving everything from sandbox-branches to sandbox? Or moving eg http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox/SOC/2006/concurrency/tags to http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox-tags? Confused. /$
On Jun 17, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
What is the recommendation then? Moving everything from sandbox-branches to sandbox? Or moving eg http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox/SOC/ 2006/concurrency/tags to http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox-tags?
That's what the recent threads about the structure of the Subversion repository were about, but there wasn't a definitive conclusion. - Doug
"Douglas Gregor" <doug.gregor@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5E29A856-536A-4045-89F6-9D9AFD3BCEFD@osl.iu.edu...
On Jun 17, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Henrik Sundberg wrote:
What is the recommendation then? Moving everything from sandbox-branches to sandbox? Or moving eg http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox/SOC/ 2006/concurrency/tags to http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox-tags?
That's what the recent threads about the structure of the Subversion repository were about, but there wasn't a definitive conclusion.
For example IMO we don't need any notion of sandbox at all. Gennadiy
Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental <at> thomson.com> writes: [...]
For example IMO we don't need any notion of sandbox at all.
Do you mean that Boost shouldn't provide a development environment for libraries that haven't been approved or that these libraries should be placed in the main Boost repository? Cheers, Nicola Musatti
"Nicola Musatti" <Nicola.Musatti@gmail.com> wrote in message news:loom.20070625T115807-98@post.gmane.org...
Gennadiy Rozental <gennadiy.rozental <at> thomson.com> writes: [...]
For example IMO we don't need any notion of sandbox at all.
Do you mean that Boost shouldn't provide a development environment for libraries that haven't been approved
No.
or that these libraries should be placed in the main Boost repository?
Yes. I mean it shouldn't be any different in svn from regular accepted library. At release time we only pick accepted libraries. Gennadiy
participants (4)
-
Douglas Gregor -
Gennadiy Rozental -
Henrik Sundberg -
Nicola Musatti