Re: [boost] Re: [website] Oh the fun..
In-Reply-To: <d4ovvk$vbv$1@sea.gmane.org> gmane@contacts.eelis.net (Eelis van der Weegen) wrote (abridged):
I think this layout makes unreasonable assumptions about the browser window width, and looks terrible when viewed in a slightly less wide browser window.
At the narrowest setting the shaded grey border consumes about 1/7th of the width. In my view that's rather a lot to spend on something that provides no useful information. It's annoying if it is the reason you have to scroll. -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK.
Dave Harris wrote:
In-Reply-To: <d4ovvk$vbv$1@sea.gmane.org> gmane@contacts.eelis.net (Eelis van der Weegen) wrote (abridged):
I think this layout makes unreasonable assumptions about the browser window width, and looks terrible when viewed in a slightly less wide browser window.
At the narrowest setting the shaded grey border consumes about 1/7th of the width. In my view that's rather a lot to spend on something that provides no useful information. It's annoying if it is the reason you have to scroll.
Now that's a good point.. I'm thinking the next design will be considerably different than the current one given the various objections to the two column layout. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org
participants (2)
-
brangdon＠cix.compulink.co.uk -
Rene Rivera