
Wouldn't extension be a lot easier if iterator_base and sequence_base took (optional) 2nd arguments that specify the tag? Then you wouldn't need that whole dance that enables tag dispatching (right?) http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/extension.html... -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com

David Abrahams wrote:
Wouldn't extension be a lot easier if iterator_base and sequence_base took (optional) 2nd arguments that specify the tag? Then you wouldn't need that whole dance that enables tag dispatching (right?)
http://boost-consulting.com/boost/libs/fusion/doc/html/fusion/extension.html...
Good point. There will be more revisions to the extension aspect of Fusion. I too am not quite happy with it -- it's still quite tedious to write your own fully conforming sequences. Thanks for the suggestion. I added this in my notebook. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
participants (2)
-
David Abrahams
-
Joel de Guzman