Andrey Semashev wrote:
I'd opt for this change if it wouldn't affect the interface in the breaking way. Otherwise, I like the way it is.
I just tested your sample and thanks to the default template value (boost::checked_deleter) it does compile. Are you sure it breaks the interface? _________________________________________________________________ Scopri tutti i servizi Windows Live, guarda i video http://www.windowslive.it/videoGallery.aspx
AMDG Berserker wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
I'd opt for this change if it wouldn't affect the interface in the
breaking way.
Otherwise, I like the way it is.
I just tested your sample and thanks to the default template value (boost::checked_deleter) it does compile.
This is non-standard behavior in gcc.
Are you sure it breaks the interface?
Yes. In Christ, Steven Watanabe
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Berserker wrote:
Andrey Semashev wrote:
I'd opt for this change if it wouldn't affect the interface in the breaking way. Otherwise, I like the way it is.
I just tested your sample and thanks to the default template value (boost::checked_deleter) it does compile.
This is non-standard behavior in gcc.
Moreover, it's fixed in recent gcc versions. It doesn't compile with my 4.3.3.
participants (3)
-
Andrey Semashev -
Berserker -
Steven Watanabe