boost.org: Minor nitpick
Hi, The following link is supposed to list the header-only packages first (more intuitive) but lists the auto-link packages first. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0?sort=header-only -dhruva -- Contents reflect my personal views only!
Reposting with proper notice... on Fri Dec 19 2008, dhruva <dhruvakm-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, The following link is supposed to list the header-only packages first (more intuitive) but lists the auto-link packages first.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_37_0?sort=header-only
-dhruva
It's always safer to open a Trac ticket; that way the issue won't be lost if someone doesn't notice your posting. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
2008/12/20 dhruva <dhruvakm@gmail.com>:
Hi, The following link is supposed to list the header-only packages first (more intuitive) but lists the auto-link packages first.
I was working on this page a little while ago. Someone suggested that the page should be filtered for 'TR1 libraries', 'header only' etc. rather than sorted so I tried doing that here: http://beta.boost.org/doc/libs How do you think that compares to sorting? Daniel
participants (3)
-
Daniel James -
David Abrahams -
dhruva