true64cxx regresion reports
Hi, While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric Conversion Library Can anyone fix this? TIA Fernando Cacciola SciSoft
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric Conversion Library.
How long since the fix has been in the CVS? Markus
"Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin@comsoft.de> escribió en el mensaje news:cju6qk$be6$1@sea.gmane.org...
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric Conversion Library.
How long since the fix has been in the CVS?
About one week Fernando
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
"Markus Schöpflin" <markus.schoepflin@comsoft.de> escribió en el mensaje
How long since the fix has been in the CVS?
About one week
Hmm, strange. Currently, a regression run is on its way, so we will see tomorrow if the error is still present. If its still there, I will remove the whole optional and regex result directories before I start the next run. The problem is, even an incremental run currently takes >24h, therefore we will have to be patient... Markus
While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is defective) I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric Conversion Library.
How long since the fix has been in the CVS?
I'm also seeing what I believe are out of date failures for regex on this platform. John.
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
While adding failure markups, I noticed that the Optional library is shown as failing with true64cxx. However, looking at the error I can see that it is using an older version of the library (one which indeed is defective)
I just uploaded a new regression run. All tests are passing now for tru64cxx65.
I'm also seeing similar results for this toolset and the Numeric Conversion Library
There is on failure left in the numeric conversion library. Is that what you would expect? Markus
participants (4)
-
Fernando Cacciola -
John Maddock -
Markus Schöpflin -
Markus Schöpflin