Agree, but which name should we used - "reverse_const_iterator" or "const_reverse_iterator"? I thought it was the latter.
Now I see :) Will fix it.
Great, after the fix I will run the same tests with VC 7.1. It is amazing how many strings are const_string-compatible objects! Thanks, Igor Kholodov cttl@users.sourceforge.net http://cttl.sourceforge.net/
Igor Kholodov <C.JUMP@prodigy.net> wrote:
Agree, but which name should we used - "reverse_const_iterator" or "const_reverse_iterator"? I thought it was the latter.
Now I see :) Will fix it.
Great, after the fix I will run the same tests with VC 7.1. It is amazing how many strings are const_string-compatible objects! Thanks,
The fix in CVS and in the tarball on http://sourceforge.net/projects/conststring/ -- Maxim Yegorushkin
participants (2)
-
Igor Kholodov -
Maxim Yegorushkin