minute patch: boost/config/posix_features.hpp

We experience compiler errors using MIPSpro C++ under IRIX. The problem goes away if we apply this patch: Index: boost/config/posix_features.hpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/config/posix_features.hpp,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -r1.15 posix_features.hpp 79c79 < # if defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500) ---
# if defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE+0 >= 500)
I can check this in, but I wanted to ask first if the "+0" was left off intentionally. It seems unlikely because "+0" is used consistently everywhere else, but just in case, is my patch OK? Thanks, Ralf __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

We experience compiler errors using MIPSpro C++ under IRIX. The problem goes away if we apply this patch:
Index: boost/config/posix_features.hpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/config/posix_features.hpp,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -r1.15 posix_features.hpp 79c79 < # if defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500) ---
# if defined(_XOPEN_SOURCE) && (_XOPEN_SOURCE+0 >= 500)
I can check this in, but I wanted to ask first if the "+0" was left off intentionally. It seems unlikely because "+0" is used consistently everywhere else, but just in case, is my patch OK?
Yep, please go ahead and check it in, thanks, John.
participants (2)
-
John Maddock
-
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve