
Not dredge up the subject of signature content up. But I do have a request, for comments and a suggestion. Even though I do have feelings about the content of signatures, I understand that most don't, so I don't care if people put whatever content they want in them. But I do care about *formatting* of the signatures. There's been a recent rash of signatures that are not clearly marked as such. Hence to me it makes for harder reading of postings as I end up confusing the body text with the sig text. May I suggest that people follow accepted netiquette rules in this regard. Signature block <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block> Netiquette <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette> -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

on Thu Feb 22 2007, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
There's been a recent rash of signatures that are not clearly marked as such. Hence to me it makes for harder reading of postings as I end up confusing the body text with the sig text.
May I suggest that people follow accepted netiquette rules in this regard.
Signature block <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block> Netiquette <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette>
Since you asked for opinions, I agree. Good suggestion. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
participants (2)
-
David Abrahams
-
Rene Rivera