[config] Any reason not to enable long long support in for Sun's compiler?
Title says it all really, any reason why I should define BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler? Seems to all work OK... John.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
Title says it all really, any reason why I should define BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler? Seems to all work OK...
It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long long as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing long long overloads for library functions. I'd say go ahead and see what happens. --Beman
Beman Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
Title says it all really, any reason why I should define BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler? Seems to all work OK...
It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long long as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing long long overloads for library functions.
I'd say go ahead and see what happens.
Nod, done, if there's any fallout I'll revert. John.
participants (2)
-
Beman Dawes -
John Maddock